ÒOur Kids, Our FutureÓ
Manchester, NH
November 20, 2007
I've visited many schools and spoken to many teachers and
students throughout my two decades of public service, but one I'll always
remember is my visit to Dodge Elementary School in Chicago just a few years
ago.
I was talking with a young teacher there, and I asked her
what she saw as the biggest challenge facing her students. She gave me an
answer that I had never heard before. She spoke about what she called
"These Kids Syndrome" - the tendency to explain away the shortcomings
and failures of our education system by saying that "these kids can't
learn" or "these kids don't want to learn" or "these kids
are just too far behind." And after awhile, "these kids" become
somebody else's problem.
And this teacher looked at me and said, "When I hear
that term it drives me nuts. They're not Ôthese kids.' They're our kids. All of
them."
She's absolutely right. The small child in Manchester or
Nashua whose parents can't find or afford a quality pre-school that we know
would make him more likely to stay in school, and read better, and succeed
later in life - he is our child.
The little girl in rural South Carolina or the South Side of
Chicago whose school is literally falling down around her, and can't afford new
textbooks, and can't attract new teachers because it can't afford to pay them a
decent salary - she is our child.
The teenager in suburban Boston who needs more skills and
better schooling to compete for the same jobs as the teenager in Bangalore or
Beijing - he is our child.
These children are our children. Their future is our future.
And it's time we understood that their education is our responsibility. All of
us.
This is a defining moment for our generation. Revolutions in
communications and technology have created a global economy of high-tech,
high-wage jobs that can be located anywhere there's an internet connection - an
economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your knowledge.
Education is now the currency of the Information Age. It's
no longer just a pathway to opportunity and success - it's a pre-requisite.
There simply aren't as many jobs today that can support a family where only a
high school degree is required. And if you don't have that degree, there are
even fewer jobs available that can keep you out of poverty.
In this kind of economy, countries who out-educate us today
will out-compete us tomorrow. Already, China is graduating eight times as many
engineers as we are. By twelfth grade, our children score lower on math and
science tests than most other kids in the world. And we now have one of the
highest high school dropout rates of any industrialized nation in the world.
Well I do not accept this future for America. I do not
accept an America where we do nothing about six million students who are
reading below their grade level - an America where sixty percent of
African-American fourth graders aren't even reading at the basic level.
I do not accept an America where only twenty percent of our
students are prepared to take college-level classes in English, math, and
science - where barely one in ten low-income students will ever graduate from
college.
I do not accept an America where we do nothing about the
fact that half of all teenagers are unable to understand basic fractions -
where nearly nine in ten African-American and Latino eighth graders are not
proficient in math. I do not accept an America where elementary school kids are
only getting an average of twenty-five minutes of science each day when we know
that over 80% of the fastest-growing jobs require a knowledge base in math and
science.
This kind of America is morally unacceptable for our
children. It's economically untenable for our future. And it's not who we are
as a country.
We are not a Ôthese kids' nation. We are the nation that has
always understood that our future is inextricably linked to the education of
our children - all of them. We are the country that has always believed in
Thomas Jefferson's declaration that "...talent and virtue, needed in a
free society, should be educated regardless of wealth or birth."
It's this belief that led America to set up the first free
public schools in small New England towns. It's a promise we kept as we moved
from a nation of farms to factories and created a system of public high schools
so that everyone had the chance to succeed in a new economy. It's a promise we
expanded after World War II, when America gave my grandfather and over two
million returning heroes the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.
And when America has fallen short of this promise - when we
forced Linda Brown to walk miles to a dilapidated Topeka school because of the
color of her skin; it was ordinary Americans who marched and bled; who took to
the streets and fought in the courts until the arrival of nine little children
at a Little Rock school made real the decision that in America, separate can
never be equal.
That's who we are. That's why I can stand here today.
Because somebody stood up when it was hard; stood up when it was risky. Because
even though my mother didn't have a lot of money, scholarships gave me the
chance to go to some of the best schools in the country. And I am running for
President of the United States because I want to give every American child the
same chances that I had.
In this election - at this defining moment - we can decide
that this century will be another American century by making an historic
commitment to education. We can make a commitment that's more than just the
rhetoric of a campaign - one that's more than another empty promise made by a
politician looking for your vote.
I often say that the problem with No Child Left Behind is
that George Bush left the money behind. And it wasn't just him, either. It's
pretty popular to bash No Child Left Behind out on the campaign trail, but when
it was being debated in Congress four years ago, my colleague Dick Durbin
offered everyone a chance to vote so that the law couldn't be enforced unless
it was fully funded. Senator Edwards and Senator Clinton passed on that chance,
and I believe that was a serious mistake.
Because I think we'd all agree that the goals of this law
were the right ones. Making a promise to educate every child with an excellent
teacher is right. Closing the achievement gap that exists in too many cities
and rural areas is right. Making sure that necessary resources and qualified
teachers are distributed equitably among every city and small town is right.
More accountability is right. Higher standards are right.
But I'll tell you what's wrong with No Child Left Behind.
Forcing our teachers, our principals, and our schools to accomplish all of this
without the resources they need is wrong. Promising high-quality teachers in
every classroom and then leaving the support and the pay for those teachers
behind is wrong. Labeling a school and its students as failures one day and
then throwing your hands up and walking away from them the next is wrong.
And by the way - don't tell us that the only way to teach a
child is to spend most of the year preparing him to fill in a few bubbles on a
standardized test. Don't tell us that these tests have to come at the expense
of music, or art, or phys. ed., or science. These tests shouldn't come at the
expense of a well-rounded education - they should help complete that
well-rounded education. The teachers I've met didn't devote their lives to
testing, they devoted them to teaching, and teaching our children is what they
should be allowed to do.
The fact is, No Child Left Behind has done more to
stigmatize and demoralize our students and teachers in struggling schools than
it has to marshal the talent and the determination and the resources to turn
them around. That's what's wrong with No Child Left Behind, and that's what we
must change in a fundamental way.
I want to lead a new era of mutual responsibility in
education - one where we all come together for the sake of our children's
success; an era where each of us does our part to make that success a reality -
parents and teachers; leaders in Washington and citizens all across America.
I won't pretend that this will be easy. We must fix the
failures of No Child Left Behind. We must provide the funding we were promised,
and give our states the resources they need, and finally meet our commitment to
special education. But that alone is not an education policy. It's just a
starting point.
A truly historic commitment to education - a real commitment
- will require new resources and new reforms. It will require a willingness to
break free from the same debates that Washington has been engaged in for
decades - Democrat versus Republican; vouchers versus the status quo; more
money versus more accountability. And most of all, it will take a President who
is honest about the challenges we face - who doesn't just tell everyone what
they want to hear, but what they need to hear.
I am running to be that President. And that's why I'm
proposing a comprehensive plan to give every American child the chance to
receive the best education America has to offer - from the moment they're born
to the day they graduate college. As President, I will put the full resources
of the federal government behind this plan. But to make it a reality, I will
also ask more of teachers and principals; parents and students; schools and
communities.
A few weeks ago, I introduced my plan to make college
affordable by creating a $4,000 per year refundable tax credit that will cover
two-thirds of the tuition at the average public college or university. And
yesterday, I unveiled my proposal to strengthen our community colleges by
offering new degrees for emerging fields and rewarding schools that graduate
more students.
Today, I want to talk about what we can do to prepare every
student to succeed in college - preparation that begins at birth and continues
with world-class schools, outstanding teachers, and transformative principals.
The first part of my plan focuses on providing quality,
affordable early childhood education to every American child.
We know what a difference early childhood programs make in
the lives of our kids. Study after study proves that children in these programs
- especially low-income children - are more likely to score higher in reading
and math, more likely to graduate high school and attend college, more likely
to hold a job and more likely to earn more on that job. And for every $1 we
invest in these programs, we get $10 back in reduced welfare rolls, fewer
health care costs, and less crime.
In recent years, states have been able to enroll nearly one
million four year olds in pre-Kindergarten programs. That's a great success,
but I believe we can do better. We need to enroll more children and we need to
start at an even earlier age. Because the fact is, studies show that from the
time of conception to the first day of kindergarten, children's development
progresses faster than at any other stage of life. By the age of three, 85% of
the brain's core structure is already formed. Eighty-five percent.
So here's what we did in Illinois. As a state Senator, I
helped create the Illinois Early Learning Council, which launched a program
called Preschool for All. This has made us one of the first states to commit to
a high quality early learning program that starts helping children from the day
they're born. It provides early care and education for new families as well as
at-risk infants and toddlers, and offer at-risk three-year olds and all
four-year-olds the chance to enroll in pre-Kindergarten programs.
There is no reason we can't and shouldn't replicate this all
across America. As President, I will launch a Children's First Agenda that
provides care, learning and support to families with children ages zero to
five. We'll create Early Learning Grants to help states create a system of
high-quality early care and education for all young children and their
families. We'll increase Head Start funding and quadruple Early Start to
include a quarter of a million at-risk children. I will create a Presidential
Early Learning Council to coordinate this effort across all levels of
government and ensure that we're providing these children and families with the
highest quality programs. And we'll help more working parents find a safe,
affordable place to leave their children during the day by improving the
educational quality of our child care programs and increasing the child care
tax credit. That's how we'll give our kids the best possible start in life, and
that's the commitment America will make when I am President.
The second part of my education plan is to recruit, support,
and reward teachers and principals to ensure that every school in America is
filled with outstanding educators.
We know that from the moment our children step into a
classroom, the single most important factor in determining their achievement is
not the color of their skin or where they come from; it's not who their parents
are or how much money they have.
It's who their teacher is. It's the man or woman who stays
past the last bell and spends their own money on books and supplies. It's
people like my sister who go beyond the call of duty because she believes
that's what makes the extra difference. And it does.
Well if we know how much teaching matters, it's time America
started acting like it. It's time we treated teaching like the profession it
is. I don't want to just talk about how great teachers are - I want to be a
President who rewards them for their greatness.
That starts with recruiting a new generation of teachers and
principals to replace the generation that's retiring and to keep up with the
record number of students entering our schools. We'll create a new Service
Scholarship program to recruit top talent into the profession, and begin by
placing these new teachers in areas like the overcrowded districts of Nevada,
or struggling rural towns here in New Hampshire, or hard-to-staff subjects like
math and science in schools all across the nation. And I will make this pledge
as President - if you commit your life to teaching, America will commit to
paying for your college education.
To prepare our new teachers, we'll require that all schools
of education are accredited, and we'll evaluate their outcomes so that we know
which ones are doing the best job at preparing the best teachers. We'll also
create a voluntary national performance assessment that actually looks at how
prospective teachers can plan, teach, and support student learning, so we can
be sure that every new educator is trained and ready to walk into the classroom
and start teaching effectively. New Hampshire is already leading the way here
by having designed a performance-based educator preparation system, and the
national assessment I'm proposing would help states like this one achieve their
goals for state-of-the-art preparation of all teachers .
To support our teachers, we will expand mentoring programs
that pair experienced, successful teachers with new recruits. We know that
mentoring is one of the most effective ways to retain the one-third of new
teachers who leave the profession in the first five years. In states that have
tried this, like California, only five percent of new teachers have quit. As
President, I will expand these mentoring programs nationwide to give all our
teachers the chance to succeed. And I will also make sure that teachers have
the conditions in which they can succeed - including excellent principals who
support their work, the materials they need to teach effectively, and time to
plan and collaborate with one another on improving instruction.
And where they do succeed - where our teachers and
principals go above and beyond the call to make a real difference in our
children's lives - I think it's time we rewarded them for it.
Cities like Denver have already proven that by working with
teachers, this can work - that we can find new ways to increase pay that are
developed with teachers, not imposed on them and not just based on an arbitrary
test score.
My plan would provide resources to try these innovative
programs in school districts all across America. Under my Career Ladder
Initiative, these districts will be able to design programs that reward
accomplished educators who serve as mentors to new teachers with the salary
increase they deserve. They can reward those who teach in underserved places
like rural New Hampshire and across urban America. And if teachers acquire
additional knowledge and skills to serve students better - if they consistently
excel in the classroom - that work can be valued and rewarded as well.
Now, if we do all this and find that there are teachers who
are still struggling and underperforming, we should provide them with
individual help and support. And if they're still underperforming after that,
we should find a quick and fair way to put another teacher in that classroom.
Teacher associations and school boards in a number of cities have led the way
by developing peer assistance and review plans that do exactly this - setting
professional standards that put children first. We owe our teachers that, and
we owe our children that.
And while we're at it, let's finally help our teachers and
principals develop assessments that teach our kids to become more than just
good test-takers. That's why the third part of my plan is to work with our
nation's governors and educators to create and use assessments that can improve
achievement all across America by including the kinds of research, scientific
investigation, and problem-solving that our children will need to compete in a
21st century knowledge economy.
New Hampshire has been a leader on this. You've developed
innovative assessments, including digital portfolios, to develop and
demonstrate student proficiency in technology, science, and other core content
areas, and there's no reason we can't start replicating this all across the
country.
The goal of educational testing should be the same as
medical testing - to diagnose a student's needs so you can help address them.
Tests should not be designed as punishment for teachers and students, they
should be used as tools to help our children grow and compete. Tests should
support learning, not just accounting. Because if we really want our children
to become the great inventors and problem-solvers of tomorrow, our schools
shouldn't stifle innovation, they should let it thrive.
One of the subject areas where this is especially important
is science. No Child Left Behind's intense emphasis on teaching to the test has
been shown to reduce the amount of time spent on teaching and assessing science
- a subject area that is absolutely critical to our competitiveness as a
nation. When I'm President, we will make science instruction a national
priority, and we'll develop assessments that don't just test isolated bits of
information, but advanced skills like logic, data analysis, and interpretation.
New Hampshire has already begun to do this, and there's no reason the rest of
the country can't do the same thing.
Finally, as you and I stand here today, know that there is a
generation of children growing up on the mean streets and forgotten corners of
this country who are slipping away from us as we speak. They walk down
Corridors of Shame in rural South Carolina and sit in battered classrooms
somewhere in East L.A. They are overwhelmingly black and Latino and poor. And when
they look around and see that no one has lifted a finger to fix their school
since the 19th century; when they are pushed out the door at the sound of the
last bell - some into a virtual war zone - is it any wonder they don't think
their education is important? Is it any wonder that they are dropping out in
rates we've never seen before?
I know these children. I know their sense of hopelessness. I
began my career over two decades ago as a community organizer on the streets of
Chicago's South Side. And I worked with parents and teachers and local leaders
to fight for their future. We set up after school programs and we even
protested outside government offices so that we could get those who had dropped
out into alternative schools. And in time, we changed futures.
And so while I know hopelessness, I also know hope. I know
that if we bring early education programs to these communities; if we stop
waiting until high-school to address the drop-out rate and start in earlier
grades; if we bring in new, qualified teachers; if we expand college outreach
programs like GEAR UP and TRIO and fight to expand summer learning
opportunities like I've done in the Senate; if we do all this, we can make a
difference in the lives of our children and the life of this country - not just
in East L.A. or the south side of Chicago, but here in Manchester, and suburban
Boston, and rural Mississippi. I know we can. I've seen it happen. And I will
work every day to do it again as your President.
But I cannot do it alone. Government cannot do it alone. We
can spend billion after billion on education in this country. We can develop a
program for every problem imaginable, and we can fund those programs with every
last dime we have.
But there is no program and no policy that can substitute
for a parent who is involved in their child's education from day one. There is
no substitute for a parent who will attend those parent/teacher conferences,
make sure their children are in school on time, and help them with their
homework after dinner. And I have no doubt that we will still be talking about
these problems in the next century if we do not have parents who are willing to
turn off the TV once in awhile, and put away the video games, and read to their
child. Responsibility for our children's education has to start at home. We
have to set high standards for them, and spend time with them, and love them.
We have to hold ourselves accountable.
You know a few years ago, a little girl at Earhart
Elementary in Chicago was asked the secret to her academic success. She said,
"I just study hard every night because I like learning. My teacher wants
me to be a good student, and so does my mother. I don't want to let them
down."
The challenge we face at this moment is great, but we have
met great challenges before. Over the course of two centuries, we have fought
and struggled and overcome to expand the promise of a good education ever
further - a promise that has allowed millions to transcend the barriers of race
and class and background to achieve their God-given potential.
It is now our moment to keep that promise - the promise of
America - alive in the 21st century. It's our generation's turn to stand up and
say to the little girl in Chicago, or the little boy in Manchester, or the
millions like them all across the country that they are not Ôthese kids' - they
are our kids. They do not want to let us down, and we cannot let them down
either. That's what I'll be fighting for in this election, and that's what I'll
do as President of the United States. I hope you'll join me in that journey.
Thank you.